Legal

Does an Adult Need a Lawyer for a Dog Bite Claim

An adult who has been injured by a dog needs a lawyer who will act on an emergency basis, pay all necessary costs, and receive 3-5 times more than what the victim could receive on his own. On this page you will find:

  • Answers to the most popular interests
  • Specific reasons why a dog bite victim should never try to be a ‘prosecutor’
  • The many benefits of professional legal aid, with no upfront cost

There are many good reasons to hire a lawyer to handle a dog bite claim.

One of the best reasons is that less than 1% of dog bite victims receive compensation. Dogs bite at least 4.7 million Americans annually, but insurance companies only pay 15,000 to 16,000 victims. See InsuranceQuotes.com, “Despite home insurance coverage, many dog ​​bites go unreported and uncompensated,” (February 2012). So without a lawyer, the victim has very little chance of getting justice.

The insurance officer will offer the victim 10% to 20% of what they would offer if the victim had a lawyer. The same insurance company will end up keeping the other 80% to 90%. Since a lawyer works on an emergency basis and only takes 33%, a victim with a lawyer would get 66% – far more than the 10% to 20% he could get for himself. “Emergency basis” means that the attorney will not ask the victim to pay anything. Getting the money will depend on the refund to the victim. If nothing is recovered, the victim will not owe anything. He will not have to pay a lawyer’s fee and he will not have to pay the lawyer’s costs. A person trying to chase a dog bite claims to be putting himself in the position of a prosecutor. This is unnecessarily upsetting. This is exacerbated by the fact that the victim himself does not know the right things to say in order to efficiently settle the lawsuit. Oftentimes, the victim brings charges that are unnecessary under the law. With a lawyer present, the victim can always comment, “It was the lawyer who said that, not me.” Cash can be exchanged easily. Thus, having a lawyer handle this legal matter is more efficient and less stressful, as well as not causing any financial risk.

The affected person’s attorney does not confront dog owners, make them feel guilty, endanger them, harass them, write threatening letters, embarrass them, foreclose their home, drive them into bankruptcy, or run them through. Euthanized dogs. At least, unless one or more of these things are absolutely necessary, and it never happens without the client’s own permission. If the client wants his lawyer to act kindly, the case will be handled according to the client’s instructions. When the claim is paid, dog owners will realize that their insurance company did all the work and paid all the money. Any of their initial anger will disappear. They will agree that the injured person appointed an attorney solely to reach a mutually fair outcome – not for the purpose of harming anyone.

Getting a lawyer is not the same thing as being sued. A good attorney knows how to file the case with the insurance company so that the case is resolved without going to court.

At least 98% of bodily injury cases are settled out of court, without trial. So someone who hires a lawyer doesn’t make matters worse, but actually ensures that the lawsuit is processed more quickly and efficiently. An attorney is the only person who can evaluate a claim on behalf of the victim. People don’t post pictures of their injuries along with their settlement dollars. So the affected person will not be able to find a free and reliable source of information about how much money it is worth. Lawyers who are inexperienced have a hard time settling cases; Victims who are not lawyers must simply guess. Adults often lose time from work when recovering from an accident. A claim for compensation for lost income requires proof from the victim’s employer. It is best for a lawyer to have it because it should contain not only basic information about the number of hours or days lost, but also some important evidence about relevant points such as causation, fringe benefits, and business reviews.

A disfigured victim may have a very high loss of earning capacity in the future, based on social and psychological research. Proof of loss of earning capacity is a specialized topic even among lawyers, something completely beyond the capacity of the accident victim. Since this can be the bulk of the loss over the years, it is essential that an experienced attorney handle this for the victim. The attorney uses his own money to obtain official and reliable copies of evidence and medical bills, engage a photographer to take pictures of the victim, hire a private investigator to learn the history of the attacking dog, and appoint a nurse counselor to review and summarize all medical evidence. This usually costs between $1,000 and $2,000 per claim. Clients are not required to pay any of these expenses until funds have been received in the claim (except in many states that do not allow attorneys to do so on an emergency basis). There is no reason for the injured to use their own money for this, especially because they often have already lost time from work due to the accident. If the victim’s medical bills are paid by health insurance or public assistance, there will be third-party claims against the settlement. If these claims go directly to the dog owner’s insurance company, they will pay the victim’s money to those third parties, no questions asked. However, lawyers who represent accident victims provide additional service to their clients by negotiating with third parties. Furthermore, there are laws that state that insurance companies and government agencies may not collect from injured persons under certain circumstances. Affected persons do not know how to deal with these third party claims; Experienced lawyers do.

Hiring a lawyer early in the process enables the insurance company to make a better estimate of the amount of compensation that the victim should receive. Experienced attorneys can provide key clues and evidence to an insurance officer; The victims themselves do not know what information to provide, or even where to find it. If a proper assessment is made soon after the accident, it will be much easier to settle the claim. An inexperienced person runs the obvious risk of passing on misinformation and insufficient evidence, making the process longer, error-prone, and more difficult.

Smith

Tricare west is a global news publication that tells the stories you want to know.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button